Help a seller understand the human system surrounding a B2B purchase: who is involved, who owns the problem, who influences the decision, who controls access, approval, implementation, budget, risk, or adoption, whether a genuine champion exists, which relationships are missing, and how to broaden engagement without damaging the current relationship.
Model A: Continuous single-chat workflow
Run Prompts 2.1–2.7 in one opportunity-specific conversation.
The chain, in order:
Run these in order. Each one produces a handoff that the next prompt expects as input. Fill in every bracketed field before you send it.
Feeds into: Prompt 2.2
You are acting as a strategic-account researcher, stakeholder-evidence analyst, buying-group specialist, and CRM data-quality reviewer.
OBJECTIVE
Build a complete stakeholder evidence inventory that distinguishes who is known, who participated, what each person actually did, what role is verified, what role is suspected, which functions are missing, and where information conflicts.
Do not yet decide who is a champion, economic buyer, or blocker.
INPUTS
Account:
Opportunity:
Current stage:
Buyer problem:
Business impact:
Desired outcome:
Known decision context:
Known stakeholders:
For each person provide where possible:
- Name
- Title
- Function
- Location
- Contact information
- Meetings attended
- Emails exchanged
- Actions taken
- Statements made
- Relationship owner
- Seller observations
Information that must remain internal:
INSTRUCTIONS
1. Validate identities and flag duplicates, former employees, outdated titles, and entity confusion.
2. Build an interaction chronology.
3. Separate buyer-stated, CRM-stated, seller-observed, publicly verified, inferred, unknown, and conflicting evidence.
4. Record verified functional responsibility.
5. Record evidence of involvement in problem ownership, evaluation, technical review, business approval, budget, finance, procurement, legal, security, implementation, adoption, executive sponsorship, and final decision.
6. Do not infer role from title.
7. Identify referenced people not yet in the contact list.
8. Identify required functions not represented.
9. Assess relationship evidence separately from influence.
10. Identify data-quality problems.
OUTPUT FORMAT
# STAKEHOLDER EVIDENCE INVENTORY
## 1. Inventory summary
## 2. Stakeholder evidence ledger
## 3. Individual interaction records
## 4. Referenced but unconfirmed people
## 5. Missing functional representation
## 6. Interaction chronology
## 7. Data-quality issues
## 8. NEXT-PROMPT HANDOFFFeeds into: Prompt 2.3
You are acting as a complex B2B buying-group analyst, organizational influence mapper, decision-process specialist, and evidence-calibration reviewer.
OBJECTIVE
Create an evidence-based buying-group map across problem ownership, functional responsibility, decision involvement, formal authority, informal influence, technical influence, economic influence, relationship strength, access, current stance, and confidence.
Do not collapse these dimensions into one label.
INPUTS
Paste Prompt 2.1 NEXT-PROMPT HANDOFF:
[PASTE HERE]
Known decision criteria:
Known decision process:
Known paper or approval process:
Known technical evaluation:
Known business approval:
Current opportunity stage:
Information that must remain internal:
INSTRUCTIONS
1. Define required buying responsibilities.
2. Map known people against responsibilities.
3. Assess authority, influence, problem ownership, technical, economic, implementation, access, relationship, engagement, stance, and confidence separately.
4. Use stance labels: actively supportive, generally supportive, neutral or unknown, skeptical, opposed, or insufficient evidence.
5. Do not use blocker without evidence of active prevention.
6. Identify formal and informal decision paths.
7. Rank missing roles by urgency.
8. Identify concentration risk.
9. Create a text-based stakeholder map.
10. Identify hypotheses requiring validation.
OUTPUT FORMAT
# BUYING-GROUP AND INFLUENCE MAP
## 1. Buying-group summary
## 2. Required buying responsibilities
## 3. Stakeholder dimension matrix
## 4. Buying-role hypotheses
## 5. Decision and information flow
## 6. Text-based stakeholder map
## 7. Coverage gaps
## 8. Concentration and single-threading risk
## 9. Validation questions
## 10. NEXT-PROMPT HANDOFFFeeds into: Prompt 2.4
You are acting as a B2B champion-development strategist, MEDDPICC qualification analyst, stakeholder-behavior reviewer, and evidence-quality auditor.
OBJECTIVE
Assess each plausible champion candidate using observed behavior and classify them as confirmed champion, developing champion, coach, active supporter, passive supporter, contact only, unknown, or unlikely champion.
Do not reward friendliness, seniority, responsiveness, or enthusiasm without evidence of influence and action.
INPUTS
Paste Prompt 2.2 NEXT-PROMPT HANDOFF:
[PASTE HERE]
Evidence of introductions:
Evidence of internal information shared:
Evidence of internal advocacy:
Evidence of actions completed:
Evidence of access provided:
Evidence of influence:
Evidence of benefit:
Seller observations:
Information that must remain internal:
INSTRUCTIONS
1. Assess influence, credibility, access, problem understanding, stake, internal context sharing, coaching, introductions, advocacy, mobilization, reliability, and candor.
2. Require behavioral evidence.
3. Identify weak evidence.
4. Classify each candidate.
5. Explain what prevents stronger classification.
6. Create ethical champion tests.
7. Create a development plan for the strongest candidate.
8. Identify coach value.
9. Identify overdependence risk.
OUTPUT FORMAT
# CHAMPION QUALIFICATION AND DEVELOPMENT REPORT
## 1. Champion summary
## 2. Candidate assessment matrix
## 3. Behavioral evidence
## 4. Champion classification definitions
## 5. Ethical validation tests
## 6. Champion-development plan
## 7. Coach strategy
## 8. Champion-risk analysis
## 9. NEXT-PROMPT HANDOFFFeeds into: Prompt 2.5
You are acting as a strategic-account relationship analyst, multithreading risk specialist, access-strategy advisor, and deal-exposure reviewer.
OBJECTIVE
Identify the opportunity's most important relationship, access, information, and stakeholder-coverage gaps based on stage, decision requirements, buyer value, timing, access routes, and relationship risk.
INPUTS
Paste Prompt 2.3 NEXT-PROMPT HANDOFF:
[PASTE HERE]
Current opportunity stage:
Expected next decision:
Current relationship owners:
Known account-team relationships:
Current communication channels:
Executive sponsor availability:
Partner relationships:
Information that must remain internal:
INSTRUCTIONS
1. Assess coverage by required buying responsibility.
2. Separate unidentified person, no access, weak relationship, and unknown alignment or influence.
3. Assess information concentration.
4. Assess access quality.
5. Assess relationship quality separately.
6. Prioritize gaps.
7. Determine safest access route.
8. Identify current-contact risk.
9. Recommend minimum relationship expansion.
10. Identify internal account-team coverage gaps.
OUTPUT FORMAT
# RELATIONSHIP AND ACCESS GAP REPORT
## 1. Executive summary
## 2. Coverage matrix
## 3. Gap classification
## 4. Single-threading analysis
## 5. Access-route analysis
## 6. Current-contact protection plan
## 7. Internal account-team coverage
## 8. Minimum viable multithreading plan
## 9. No-action list
## 10. NEXT-PROMPT HANDOFFFeeds into: Prompt 2.6
You are acting as a B2B stakeholder-messaging strategist, enterprise value-narrative architect, buyer-role analyst, and claims-verification editor.
OBJECTIVE
Create an internal value-narrative framework for each priority stakeholder explaining why they should care, which buyer-verified problem or outcome is relevant, which responsibility they may own, what evidence they require, what the seller needs to learn, and what action is appropriate.
Do not create generic persona messaging.
INPUTS
Paste Prompt 2.4 NEXT-PROMPT HANDOFF:
[PASTE HERE]
Buyer-verified problems:
Buyer-verified impact:
Desired outcomes:
Current solution or process:
My offering:
Relevant capabilities:
Priority stakeholders:
Known decision criteria:
Information that must remain internal:
INSTRUCTIONS
1. Build a narrative for each priority stakeholder.
2. Separate verified and hypothesized responsibilities, buyer-verified relevance, likely concerns, unknowns, and evidence needed.
3. Create a value bridge from situation to responsibility to consequence to outcome to capability to proof to action.
4. Tailor by legitimate buying responsibility.
5. Create stakeholder-safe language.
6. Identify stakeholder-specific questions.
7. Create proof requirements.
8. Create objection hypotheses.
9. Create internal message hierarchy.
OUTPUT FORMAT
# STAKEHOLDER VALUE NARRATIVE MATRIX
## 1. Narrative strategy
## 2. Stakeholder narratives
## 3. Value-bridge table
## 4. Proof-requirement matrix
## 5. Concern and objection hypotheses
## 6. Shared versus distinct messaging
## 7. Message-claims audit
## 8. NEXT-PROMPT HANDOFFFeeds into: Prompt 2.7
You are acting as an enterprise multithreading strategist, stakeholder-engagement planner, account-team coordinator, and customer-communication quality editor.
OBJECTIVE
Create a coordinated engagement plan specifying who should be engaged, why engagement is useful to the buyer, who should initiate it, which route should be used, what value should be offered, what action should be requested, how the current contact should be protected, and how internal sellers should coordinate.
INPUTS
Paste Prompt 2.5 NEXT-PROMPT HANDOFF:
[PASTE HERE]
Current opportunity milestone:
Target date:
Current contact:
Champion or coach candidate:
Internal account team:
Available executive sponsor:
Available partner relationships:
Existing meetings:
Communication restrictions:
Information that must remain internal:
INSTRUCTIONS
1. Prioritize engagement around the next buyer decision.
2. Define stakeholder, responsibility, reason now, buyer value, access route, initiator, internal support, message objective, CTA, proof, risk, and fallback.
3. Sequence engagements.
4. Create introduction options.
5. Protect the current contact.
6. Design internal team selling.
7. Create customer-facing drafts only where useful.
8. Keep drafts human, specific, concise, transparent, and evidence based.
9. Create meeting objectives.
10. Create tracking and feedback rules.
11. Define failure and pause conditions.
OUTPUT FORMAT
# MULTI-THREADED ENGAGEMENT PLAN
## 1. Strategy summary
## 2. Prioritized engagement sequence
## 3. Current-contact alignment plan
## 4. Introduction requests
## 5. Transparent direct outreach
## 6. Stakeholder meeting plans
## 7. Internal team-selling plan
## 8. Timing and dependency plan
## 9. Tracking rules
## 10. Failure and pause conditions
## 11. NEXT-PROMPT HANDOFFFeeds into: your CRM and the next workflow
You are acting as a strategic-account stakeholder analyst, deal-relationship inspector, champion reassessment specialist, CRM documentation editor, and account-plan consolidator.
OBJECTIVE
Update the stakeholder strategy based on new evidence and determine what changed, which assumptions were confirmed or rejected, whether roles changed, whether champion status changed, whether access improved, whether new risks appeared, and what the seller should do next.
INPUTS
Paste Prompt 2.6 NEXT-PROMPT HANDOFF:
[PASTE HERE]
New meetings:
New emails or communications:
New introductions:
New participants:
New actions completed:
Missed or declined actions:
Role changes:
New decision-process information:
New seller observations:
Current opportunity stage:
Current next milestone:
Information that must remain internal:
INSTRUCTIONS
1. Compare new evidence with the previous strategy.
2. Record changes in stakeholder list, roles, influence, authority, stance, engagement, relationship, access, champion classification, decision process, risks, and required coverage.
3. Reclassify assumptions.
4. Reassess champion candidates.
5. Reassess single-threading.
6. Reassess milestone participants.
7. Identify relationships to deepen, maintain, pause, add, or remove.
8. Create a milestone-based action plan.
9. Create CRM-ready updates.
10. Create an executive summary.
11. Select the next workflow.
12. Create context-transfer block.
OUTPUT FORMAT
# UPDATED STAKEHOLDER STRATEGY PACKAGE
## 1. What changed
## 2. Current buying-group map
## 3. Champion update
## 4. Relationship and access update
## 5. Stakeholder risk register
## 6. Next-milestone coverage
## 7. Priority relationship actions
## 8. CRM-ready stakeholder updates
## 9. Internal executive summary
## 10. Selected next workflow
## 11. CONTEXT-TRANSFER BLOCK
## 12. Quality-control report